As per the newest statistics, round $eight million was paid as charges to conduct transactions on the Ethereum community. That works out to be roughly 18,300 ETH. What’s driving this humongous spike in gasoline charges? Analysis exhibits that it’s because of the booming ‘yield farming’ craze.
As per information from Glassnode, transaction charges paid on the Ethereum community topped $eight million lately (learn August 13, 2020).
This can be a new all-time excessive degree for every day charges on the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency community. The final gasoline spike occurred greater than two years again in January 2018, the height of 2017’s bull market.
One could surprise in regards to the supposed motive that’s catalyzing the exponential surge in gasoline charges. The newest Glassnode Insights piece has revealed that it’s Ethereum’s big transactional demand that’s pushing switch value numbers greater. However what’s the supply of this demand?
From the start of the yr to this point, US Greenback pegged secure coin, USDT’s market cap has grown threefold from $four billion to a bit of above $12 billion. Tether holds the lead in Ethereum’s stablecoin area. And USDT transfers have accounted for 14 p.c of all transaction charges in August.
All different secure coin transfers have simply contributed to 1.2% of the gasoline charges. Nonetheless, collectively that is lower than than the quarter of the charges generated. Glassnode notes that “other contracts” (apart from ERC-20 tokens and stablecoins) accounted for the lion’s share of transaction charges this month.
Amongst “other contracts” are all DeFi purposes which have taken the cryptocurrency business by storm. And amongst these DeFi purposes are decentralized exchanges or DEXs which are the key ‘gas guzzlers’ within the Ethereum ecosystem. Most notably, Uniswap.
As per Glassnode’s observations, the spike in gasoline charges isn’t just due to token transfers. Sensible contract purposes akin to staking, lending, and pooling require a large quantity of charges for performing their supposed actions.
Some Ethereum good contract operating purposes are serving to merchants generate profits via arbitrage alternatives.
Their makers haven’t made the supply code public. Nonetheless, from the same patterns that the purposes are displaying, they’re most probably arbitrage bots shopping for and promoting tokens principally between Uniswap and Balancer. And the way ‘gas-intensive’ ar these bots?
Glassnode notes that:
“… of the top 20 contracts this month, arbitrage bots make up for almost 20% of fees.”
“These suspected arbitrage bots in the top 20 have spent around USD$2.5 million worth of ETH on gas this month alone.”
Other than this, Galssnode has discovered that buying and selling opportunists are gaming the DeFi ecosystem by leveraging arbitrage alternatives in numerous secure cash to make insane earnings, whereas nonchalantly paying excessive gasoline charges.
Ethereum primarily based Ponzi schemes Forsage and Lionsshare are gas-intensive good contracts which have contributed to round 16 p.c of transaction charges paid.
As per Glassnode’s observations:
“Forsage.io was already the second-highest contract in terms of fees paid in 2020. At the time, however, it had contributed towards less than 3000 ETH in fees in the first 6 months of 2020. Now, it has contributed to nearly 5000 ETH in fees in the first 2 weeks of August alone, illustrating the sheer extent to which gas prices have increased.”
Whereas the vast majority of the demand for Ethereum community utilization could also be coming from DeFi components, default ‘account-to-account’ ETH transfers have additionally been noticed to eat gasoline considerably.
General Glassnode noticed that the surge in Ethereum transaction charges is as a result of merchants, traders, and yield farmers are anticipating the following bull market. This anticipation is, in flip, paving means for the large demand in all Ethereum niches.
Binance Futures 50 USDT FREE Voucher: Use this hyperlink to register & get 10% off charges and 50 USDT when buying and selling 500 USDT (restricted – first 200 sign-ups & unique to CryptoPotato).
Click on right here to begin buying and selling on BitMEX and obtain 10% low cost on charges for six months.
First blow to Ethereum’s little brother – Somag News
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 11,850.74
Ethereum (ETH) $ 433.42
XRP (XRP) $ 0.299480
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
ChainLink (LINK) $ 19.05
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 303.39
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.137975
Litecoin (LTC) $ 61.98
Bitcoin SV (BSV) $ 218.09
EOS (EOS) $ 3.87
Binance Coin (BNB) $ 23.21
Crypto.com Coin (CRO) $ 0.167988
Tezos (XTZ) $ 4.14
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.107360
TRON (TRX) $ 0.027161
OKB (OKB) $ 5.93
Monero (XMR) $ 90.19
Cosmos (ATOM) $ 6.04
VeChain (VET) $ 0.019648
LEO Token (LEO) $ 1.28
USD Coin (USDC) $ 0.999129
IOTA (MIOTA) $ 0.417411
Huobi Token (HT) $ 4.80
NEO (NEO) $ 15.32
cDAI (CDAI) $ 0.020748
Dash (DASH) $ 93.94
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 7.13
Zcash (ZEC) $ 84.28
Synthetix Network Token (SNX) $ 6.64
Aave (LEND) $ 0.515626
Compound (COMP) $ 200.27
Maker (MKR) $ 695.63
NEM (XEM) $ 0.065268
Ontology (ONT) $ 0.875447
Algorand (ALGO) $ 0.648616
DigiByte (DGB) $ 0.034592
Basic Attention Token (BAT) $ 0.303274
cETH (CETH) $ 8.68
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.003506
Dai (DAI) $ 1.01
Waves (WAVES) $ 3.95
Theta Network (THETA) $ 0.383821
0x (ZRX) $ 0.525541
Kyber Network (KNC) $ 1.91
UMA (UMA) $ 7.24
OMG Network (OMG) $ 2.55
REN (REN) $ 0.396963
BitTorrent (BTT) $ 0.000516
FTX Token (FTT) $ 3.44
Qtum (QTUM) $ 3.18
Author: News Bureau
Record Ethereum Network Use and Gas Fees Pose Risk to DeFi Expansion – Crypto Money Daily
The number of Ethereum network transactions more than doubled in 2020 and is now virtually identical to the January 2018 all-time high.
As shown on the chart below, the number of transactions doubled in the past six months to stand at 1.23 million per day.
Ethereum 7-day average daily transactions. Source: CoinMetrics
This situation might seem very bullish at first, but one must remember both EOS and Tron (TRX) started as ERC-20 tokens before launching their own mainnet and running fully independent blockchains.
A similar chain migration is happening on Tether’s USDT, a stablecoin which recently secured a $12 billion market capitalization.
Tether was created under the OMNI protocol, which runs on the Bitcoin network and most of the USDT tokens were moved to the Ethereum network to avoid increasing Bitcoin (BTC) transaction fees.
Ethereum 7-day average transaction fee. Source: BitInfoCharts
As Ethereum fees rose throughout 2019, a similar movement happened over the past year, as some Tether (USDT) holders opted for the Tron network.
This occurred while median Ethereum transaction fees increased threefold to $0.14 in July 2019, although this seems insignificant compared to the current $3.
Current Tether USDT balance sheet. Source: Tether
The Tron network currently holds half the amount of USDT under ERC-20 and it will likely increase its share, considering the recent Ethereum network fees.
For comparison, USD Tether was dominated by Omni in August 2019, while Tron represented less than 3% of its market capitalization.
Tether USDT balance sheet in August 2019. Source: Tether
It is worth highlighting that USDT is currently circulating in EOS, Liquid, Algorand, and Bitcoin Cash SLP networks, although on a much smaller scale.
To better gauge the odds of additional outflow from the Ethereum ecosystem, one should analyze what kind of transactions are taking place. Stablecoins, for example, have fewer incentives to withhold during periods of network constraint.
On the other hand, switching networks on DeFi applications such as Maker (MKR) and Compound (COMP) seem less obvious.
Competing smart contract platforms have their disadvantages, and a much smaller ecosystem, as reported by Cointelegraph.
Top weekly active Ethereum tokens. Source: Etherscan
Etherscan data shows growing use by Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications on the Ethereum network, but how sustainable are those numbers considering the current fee levels?
Data from DefiPulse shows that the total value locked in DeFi grew an impressive five-fold over the past 90 days. While this is astounding, exactly how many of these Ethereum transactions are related to this figure?
Yearn.finance (YFI) transaction amount and count. Source: Etherscan
According to Etherscan data, yearn.finance (YFI) averaged daily 3,400 transactions in the past week with 15,700 token transfers.
Considering its $5,175 price over that period, each transfer was worth $23,900 on average, meaning a $3 fee increase should not be an impediment.
To ascertain whether YFI is an outlier, one should analyze Synthetix Network Token (SNX), another DeFi contender among the top 20 most active Ethereum contracts.
Synthetix Network Token (SNX) transaction amount and count. Source: Etherscan
As per the above chart, SNX averaged daily 2,800 transactions past week with 8.3 million token transfers. Considering its $4.70 price over that period, each transfer was worth $13,900 on average. This is yet another indication that no exaggerated impact was caused by increasing Ethereum network fees.
Chainlink (LINK) is the largest token aiming to provide oracle solutions, and despite being interoperable on multiple chains, it’s indeed an Ethereum ERC-20 token.
Its increasing usage seems to be behind an impressive 88% surge over two weeks, as reported by Cointelegraph.
Chainlink (LINK) transaction amount and count. Source: Etherscan
LINK averaged 35,000 daily transactions in the past week and 34 million token transfers. Considering its $13.40 price over that period, each transfer was worth $13,000 on average.
This analysis is another positive indicator that despite the recent Ethereum network increasing fees, some major oracle and DeFi applications will be able to withstand it, at least momentarily.
The Ethereum network’s rising fees have been accelerating second layer solutions development on some DeFi applications.
Although the overall impact for Ethereum might be positive, as it might prevent the migration of applications to competing networks, it certainly does not paint a good picture for investors and the general public.
Ethereum 2.0 development is under immense pressure to deliver a network which is better able to address the rapidly growing demand from stablecoins, oracles, decentralized exchanges, and DeFi.
The most important question to ask now is will the current Ether (ETH) holders and the network developers adapt to the current constraints?
The answer to this might depend on what competing cryptocurrency networks can offer, so in addition to tracking Ether price, wise investors should also monitor the network’s activity closely.
The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.